Spread the love

Nepal’s security policy does not prioritize war but rather lasting peace across the globe. Therefore, in the past, Nepal proposed declaring itself a “Zone of Peace” (ZoP). This does not mean that Nepal does not need a military force; rather, the country needs a strong military to contribute to global peace efforts. Accordingly, the military is also essential for monitoring and safeguarding international borders and for conducting rescue and relief operations during natural calamities.

At present, escalating tensions and conflicts around the world, along with U.S. President Donald Trump’s open challenge to the global order, have put pressure on small countries like Nepal to further strengthen their military capabilities.

Nevertheless, a section of so-called “intellectuals,” funded by foreign powers, has become active in denouncing the Nepal Army. This group is even advocating the dismantling of this historic institution. Be that as it may, Nepal’s current need is to empower its security organs, including the Nepal Army.

There may be debate about budgetary constraints. However, the country could manage resources by removing the federal structure and reducing the number of local bodies. Moreover, Nepal could establish a construction army, and the government could allow the Army to run certain projects—such as textile and other industries—by utilizing its reserve funds under the Nepal Army Welfare Fund.

At the same time, the Army should remain vigilant against negative campaigns targeting the institution. Recently, video clips alleging the involvement of senior officials in corruption and commissions have been circulated, yet the Nepal Army has issued no response. The Army should establish a strong and autonomous anti-corruption department and immediately initiate investigations whenever complaints arise. Discipline and transparency are the core pillars of the Nepal Army’s image and prestige.

In conclusion, the government must strengthen the security organs and cannot evade this responsibility by citing a lack of funds. At the same time, these institutions must uphold strict discipline and transparency.