Spread the love

By Our Reporter

Nepal’s democracy rests on a simple principle: leaders must answer to the people. Yet, as the March 5, 2026, House of Representatives election draws near, the question of accountability has taken center stage. KP Sharma Oli, despite the controversies of his past—including his handling of the Gen Z protests—has taken a bold step by calling for a pre-election debate among the top prime minister candidates.

Whether driven by confidence in his oratory or political strategy, Oli’s move underscores a basic democratic truth: voters deserve to hear candidates explain how they would govern and respond to hard questions about their records.

While Oli steps forward, former Kathmandu mayor Balen Shah, the Rastriya Swatantra Party’s candidate and leader of the Gen Z movement, has surprised many by refusing the debate. For a candidate positioned as a reformist and anti-corruption voice, this is concerning. Shah has yet to explain how he plans to fight systemic corruption, strengthen the federal system, improve service delivery, or prioritize national reforms.

Remaining silent on these crucial issues leaves voters in the dark—and that is a luxury no prime minister can afford. His tenure as Kathmandu’s mayor allowed him to operate behind bureaucratic screens, but the national stage offers no such refuge.

The importance of debate extends beyond Shah. All top contenders, including the Nepali Congress candidate, must embrace public scrutiny. Debates give voters a chance to compare visions, challenge promises, and make informed choices. Leaders who avoid this responsibility risk appearing evasive, disconnected, or unready to govern.

Sah’s decision to sidestep debate is more than a personal choice—it highlights a gap in our political culture. Public debates should be a routine part of Nepal’s elections, not an occasional spectacle. Media and civil society must insist on transparency and create forums where policies and programs face real scrutiny.

This election is a test for democracy. Candidates must speak openly, defend their plans, and engage directly with citizens.

Sah cannot hide behind silence. He must articulate his vision and answer tough questions. Avoiding debate undermines credibility and leaves voters without the clarity they deserve. In Nepal, leadership is not just about promises—it is about accountability, and there is no substitute for facing the people.