Kathmandu, Aug 10:  A tense one-hour conversation took place between Madhav Kumar Nepal, chairman of the Nepal Communist Party (Unified Socialist), and respected leader Jhalnath Khanal, as the two traded sharp public statements against each other. The meeting was organized after both sides exchanged accusations, even suggesting that the other should leave the party.

The discussion involved senior leaders Beduram Bhusal, Pramesh Hamal, Rajendra Pandey, and Ghanshyam Bhusal, who tried to mediate. It started at 9 a.m. Saturday at the party’s central office in Aloknagar.

Sources say the dialogue opened lines of communication, but didn’t reach a clear conclusion. Both leaders used the chance to clarify their positions.

Khanal stressed that his long-held stance about seriously addressing rebellion within the party had not changed. He rejected the claim that he had confirmed any revolt. But he objected to Madhav Nepal’s threat to expel anyone denying proof of rebellion.

Madhav Nepal, on the other hand, denied ever suggesting that Khanal should quit the party. Instead, he said he wanted to clear the path for party unity. However, Khanal reportedly insisted on a political course that calls for Khanal’s departure.

The two also discussed Madhav Nepal’s ongoing legal case related to the Patanjali land issue. Khanal argued that, since it is a personal matter, steps should be taken to clear obstacles—suggesting appointing someone as acting leader during the court proceedings.

Despite Madhav Nepal recalling their long history and shared struggles, Khanal maintained his firm position, linking political ethics and principles closely.

The talk ended with Madhav Nepal leaving for a program in the Terai region, while Khanal stayed back and later held a lengthy meeting with leader Bamdev Gautam in Dallu. Gautam reportedly expressed frustration about being sidelined since the two parties united last Ashar, and about not being given any responsibilities. The meeting covered relations with Madhav Nepal and the party’s future direction.

The rift within the party remains unresolved, leaving questions about its future leadership and unity. People’s News Monitoring Service