By Nirmal P. Acharya There are three interrelated pillars of American hegemony in the world: the US military, the US dollar and the colour revolution otherwise also called power, dominance and leadership. Among them, the US military might sound the most terrifying, but it is, in fact, the least powerful. During the Korean War in the 1950s, the Vietnam War in the 1970s, and most recently in Afghanistan, the outcome of the US military has been woefully ineffective. Certainly, the US dollar is indeed more lethal, as it is printed the interest rates rise and fall, an important closed-loop easily cutting the world's leeks with the dollar cycle (tide). However, the most powerful of the three pillars is the "colour revolution," which dismembered the Soviet Union as a superpower without even firing a shot. The world now better understands that the US military is better suited for intimidating poses rather than actual combat. During the Russia-Ukraine war, the US only sold weapons to Ukraine on a large scale, stood behind and roared, but not a single soldier was sent to fight in Ukraine. In fact, the only thing the US is really willing to export is actually the "colour revolution". Nepal is located between China and India, both of which are the countries where the US will have colour revolution sooner or later. The US launched multiple rounds of colour revolution attacks on China by stirring up the issues in Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. But after decades of effort, the US has not yet succeeded. In such circumstances, the US must realize that its colour revolution theory and model need to be upgraded. In my personal observation, the US went to great lengths in signing the MCC with Nepal and is committed to further signing the SPP, to test an upgraded version of the colour revolution in Nepal. As we know, the basic model of the colour revolution is to establish various NGOs in the target country in advance and then wait for the opportunity to mobilise these NGOs to bring down the government. Therefore, in the past, the relationship between NGOs and the government has always been antagonistic relationship. In Nepal, however, the US has structured the relationship between the NGO and the government into a husband-wife relationship, with the husband holding the top position in the government and the wife calling the waves in the NGO. Perhaps one day, Secretary Blinken will announce that an upgraded version of the American Colour Revolution has been upgraded and field-tested in Nepal and the world will be observing the conference on the Colour Revolution Upgrade Version in Nepal.